Lenovo 20NFS0CW00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20NFS0CW00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20NFS0CW00
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200330
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 16:27
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700U
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
70.1% Very good
Memory 71.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 219
76% 137 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 526
56% 449 Pts
64-Core 558
34% 558 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Legend(17AA 5124) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.41.22.01
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
12.2% Very poor
Lighting 14.6
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 20.8
12% 16.4 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 16.1
Splatting 17.3
13% 15.4 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.2%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Imation M.2 PCIe 512GB SSD X831B
393GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM20E1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 541 371 364 361 363 366 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 685
Write 1,642
Mixed 931
SusWrite 394
208% 913 MB/s
4K Read 46.3
4K Write 156
4K Mixed 70.6
243% 91 MB/s
DQ Read 964
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 900
645% 835 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 163%
Great: 214%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 14244514
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 120 123 123 124 123 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 162
Write 94.3
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.7
217% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 79%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.5
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27.9
87% 30.4 GB/s
SC Read 22.3
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 24.1
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 98.2
41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback