Fujitsu ESPRIMO P410

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P410  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3120-A1
Memory2.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20131002
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 02 '20 at 15:29
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 82.7
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 150
63% 105 Pts
4-Core 154
8-Core 155
21% 154 Pts
64-Core 157
10% 157 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
PNY(196E 066D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 341.44
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.27
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.36 fps
MRender 2.86
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 1.83
2% 1.82 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 101 103 100 98 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
56.9% Above average
Read 100
Write 94.1
Mixed 39.4
SusWrite 98.4
60% 83 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
446GB free
Firmware: FJK3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 114 111 115 114 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
63.7% Good
Read 109
Write 108
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 113
69% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 Kingston ACR256X64D3U1333C9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 16.2
48% 17 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 15.5
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ESPRIMO P410 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P410

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback