Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 68%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 23:15
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$248
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 140
2-Core 257
93% 164 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 754
74% 608 Pts
64-Core 754
47% 754 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.8% Excellent
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 98.3
Parallax 77
80% 91.3 fps
MRender 98.6
Gravity 99.9
Splatting 101
82% 99.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,522
Write 1,408
Mixed 1,307
315% 1,412 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 69.7
252% 97.3 MB/s
DQ Read 853
DQ Write 1,029
DQ Mixed 659
575% 847 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
WDC WDS200T2B0A 2TB
325GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 453 461 465 389 375 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 334
Mixed 354
SusWrite 428
88% 393 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 36.4
125% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 272
225% 324 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 117%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 115 116 114 115 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
64.4% Good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 76.2
SusWrite 115
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$72
89GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 79 76 75 77 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.1% Average
Read 80.8
Write 83.3
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 75.8
49% 67.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 84%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$54
164GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 97 96 97 97 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 93
Write 92.5
Mixed 69.3
SusWrite 96.5
65% 87.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 1
204% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 112%
SanDisk Extreme Go USB 3.1 64GB-$23
52GB free, PID 558b
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 17 11 20 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 12.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 28
SusWrite 16
29% 20 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 2.6
186% 3.37 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
MC Read 34.3
MC Write 35.5
MC Mixed 28.4
94% 32.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 37.4
SC Mixed 28.1
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 602 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $671
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback