Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 77%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z270M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory22.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161228
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 27 '20 at 22:13
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$235
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.1% Outstanding
Memory 95.2
1-Core 139
2-Core 254
92% 163 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 700
73% 585 Pts
64-Core 711
44% 711 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 91.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.7% Very good
Lighting 96.5
Reflection 98.1
Parallax 75.8
79% 90.1 fps
MRender 98.4
Gravity 99.4
Splatting 101
82% 99.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB (2018)-$59
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 101110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,660
Write 1,538
Mixed 1,321
336% 1,507 MB/s
4K Read 45.6
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 67.5
248% 96.1 MB/s
DQ Read 850
DQ Write 1,104
DQ Mixed 743
626% 899 MB/s
Poor: 141% Great: 228%
WDC WDS200T2B0A 2TB
335GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 448 459 318 218 282 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
93.6% Outstanding
Read 441
Write 291
Mixed 361
SusWrite 353
81% 361 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 64.8
4K Mixed 36.6
125% 43.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 323
DQ Mixed 271
226% 326 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 93.6%
Great: 117%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$39
1TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 113 115 112 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 132
Write 112
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 113
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
171% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$50
97GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 86 85 85 86 86 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
48.7% Average
Read 84.3
Write 88
Mixed 65
SusWrite 85
60% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
175% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 48.7%
Great: 84%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$51
154GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 97 97 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 110
Write 103
Mixed 77
SusWrite 97
72% 96.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
MC Read 32.8
MC Write 35.2
MC Mixed 27.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 21.1
SC Write 36.7
SC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.4 GB/s
Latency 56.4
71% 56.4 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME Z270M-PLUS Builds (Compare 600 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z270M-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $661
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $290Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback