Razer Blade

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Razer
Memory7.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170401
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 85.4
1-Core 99.8
2-Core 197
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 556
54% 446 Pts
64-Core 574
36% 574 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 73%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 630
Device(1A58 6755) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6373
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.48% Terrible
Lighting 7.83
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 7.59
6% 8.9 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 14.9
10% 11.3 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 7.48%
Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6755) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 441.28
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
50% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 70.5
Parallax 56.4
49% 62.3 fps
MRender 67.6
Gravity 57.3
Splatting 65.7
52% 63.5 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 50%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXY7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,353
Write 1,275
Mixed 721
248% 1,117 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 143
4K Mixed 65.4
223% 83.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1079
DQ Write 975
DQ Mixed 959
738% 1,005 MB/s
Poor: 126% Great: 259%
SDXC Card 64GB
50GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 32 31 32 32 31 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 40.5
Write 37.8
Mixed 37
SusWrite 31.5
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 6.7
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 4.3
280% 4.73 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 41%
Sony DSC 64GB
37GB free, PID 0ac4
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 8.2 8.3 8.3 8.3 8.2 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
7.69% Terrible
Read 21.5
Write 10
Mixed 13
SusWrite 8.2
16% 13.2 MB/s
4K Read 2.7
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 1.5
85% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.69%
Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HDZ-2G3B1 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
72.6% Very good
MC Read 26.2
MC Write 28
MC Mixed 23.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.9
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 21.9
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 71.7
56% 71.7 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Builds (Compare 4,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback