Asrock AB350M-HDV R4.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (88th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 12 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics12.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock AB350M-HDV R4.0  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191114
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 01 '20 at 17:43
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 82.3
1-Core 96.4
2-Core 212
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 419
8-Core 437
57% 428 Pts
64-Core 439
27% 439 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
AMD(1002 15DD) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.11.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
Lighting 15
Reflection 16
Parallax 19.5
12% 16.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 15
Splatting 18.9
14% 16.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
63GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 91 57 56 43 49 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
63% Good
Read 480
Write 416
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 110
57% 258 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 15
4K Mixed 23.9
80% 22 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 1.2
78% 185 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3000 C16 Series 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.7
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 33.7
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 23.1
SC Write 33.9
SC Mixed 26.7
80% 27.9 GB/s
Latency 76.3
52% 76.3 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 106%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical AB350M-HDV R4.0 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock AB350M-HDV R4.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $230
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback