ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Envy Pro Curved All-in-One PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 13% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	18.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP Envy Pro Curved All-in-One PC (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 2B4C
Memory	4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150917
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 31 '20 at 17:52
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	SVK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700T 9,225 User benchmarks, average bench 70% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 72.2 1-Core 100 2-Core 202 70% 125 Pts	4-Core 383 8-Core 516 57% 450 Pts	64-Core 494 31% 494 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 960A 107 User benchmarks, average bench 18% HP(103C 2B4C) 2GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4614 Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Lighting 23 Reflection 17.2 Parallax 19.8 19% 20 fps	MRender 24.6 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 17 17% 21.4 fps
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 19%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZHPV256HDGL-000H1 256GB 58 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 109GB free (System drive) Firmware: BXW24H0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 1098 866 760 699 166 117 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 74% Great: 93%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 401GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 42 41 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Read 35 Write 39.2 Mixed 31 SusWrite 40.8 27% 36.5 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.4 4K Mixed 0.3 156% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 65%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 256GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 63GB free, PID 0736 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 20 19 20 19 19 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	18.2% Very poor	Read 17.2 Write 18.8 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 19.4 24% 17.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 3.3 245% 4.03 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 18.2% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GS6AFR8N-TF 1x8GB 45,898 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	36.7% Below average	MC Read 13.5 MC Write 12.7 MC Mixed 10.7 35% 12.3 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 12.4 SC Mixed 12.7 35% 12.4 GB/s	Latency 96.5 42% 96.5 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback