Packard EasyNote TS44HR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemPackard EasyNote TS44HR  (all builds)
MotherboardPackard SJV50_HR
Memory3.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110425
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 13:03
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2630QM-$230
CPU1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
62.3% Good
Memory 82.5
1-Core 75.2
2-Core 143
61% 100 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 263
33% 253 Pts
64-Core 269
17% 269 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 540M
Acer(1025 0512) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.9135
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 3.96
Parallax 1.69
3% 3.08 fps
MRender 5.57
Gravity 4.03
Splatting 2.91
3% 4.17 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
254GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 303 119 159 124 99 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 299
Write 278
Mixed 229
SusWrite 185
56% 248 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 39.1
4K Mixed 22.1
77% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 25.2
DQ Write 78.3
DQ Mixed 32.8
31% 45.4 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Nanya NT4GC64B8HB0NS-CG NT2GC64B8HC0NS-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
45.9% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 15.2
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 11.2
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EasyNote TS44HR Builds (Compare 75 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Packard EasyNote TS44HR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $261
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback