Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 134%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive249% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200513
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 07:43
Run Duration327 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
96.4% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 150
2-Core 299
95% 177 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 1,132
102% 861 Pts
64-Core 2,122
131% 2,122 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 96.4%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2945 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
137% Outstanding
Lighting 194
Reflection 200
Parallax 184
158% 193 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 190
Splatting 131
121% 149 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 137%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
267GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1824 499 499 486 397 400 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 2009
Write 2380
Mixed 1,908
SusWrite 684
392% 1,745 MB/s
4K Read 46.4
4K Write 183
4K Mixed 81.1
271% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,033
DQ Write 867
DQ Mixed 965
719% 955 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 249%
Great: 387%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
666GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 831 834 812 169 166 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
556GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 830 831 834 831 824 819 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
883GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1969 1511 1510 1506 1511 1507 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
298% Outstanding
Read 2,005
Write 2,125
Mixed 1,784
SusWrite 1,586
422% 1,875 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 159
4K Mixed 70.4
244% 91.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,083
DQ Write 956
DQ Mixed 1,016
763% 1,018 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 298%
Great: 347%
Synology iSCSI Storage 3.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 91 88 93 95 93 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 94.5
Write 69.6
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 91.3
20% 86.8 MB/s
4K Read 11
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 11.5
38% 11.4 MB/s
DQ Read 97.4
DQ Write 79.9
DQ Mixed 86.9
66% 88.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25%
Great: 40%
SanDisk Cruzer Edge 64GB
59GB free, PID 556b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 6.1 6 6.9 6.1 6.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
5.06% Terrible
Read 22
Write 8.2
Mixed 7
SusWrite 6.2
12% 10.9 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.7
32% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.06%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 42.2
MC Write 41.4
MC Mixed 41.9
120% 41.8 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 38.6
84% 29.5 GB/s
Latency 76.1
53% 76.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 112%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback