Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 126%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '20 at 07:01
Run Duration309 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$375
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
93% Outstanding
Memory 78.3
1-Core 145
2-Core 290
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 577
8-Core 1055
98% 816 Pts
64-Core 2,035
126% 2,035 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$230
CLim: 2050 MHz, MLim: 2945 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
118% Outstanding
Lighting 165
Reflection 166
Parallax 152
134% 161 fps
MRender 106
Gravity 157
Splatting 109
101% 124 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 118%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
268GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1108 496 472 496 479 413 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
218% Outstanding
Read 1,925
Write 2,219
Mixed 1,704
SusWrite 577
361% 1,606 MB/s
4K Read 36.2
4K Write 144
4K Mixed 60.5
208% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,023
DQ Write 842
DQ Mixed 949
706% 938 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 218%
Great: 387%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
666GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 679 819 785 790 760 773 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 121%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
556GB free
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 679 819 785 790 760 773 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2019)-$77
883GB free
Firmware: 102000WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1584 1386 1493 1455 1445 1446 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
262% Outstanding
Read 1,542
Write 1,775
Mixed 1,508
SusWrite 1468
355% 1,573 MB/s
4K Read 38.2
4K Write 135
4K Mixed 63.7
211% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 1,054
DQ Write 955
DQ Mixed 999
751% 1,003 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 262%
Great: 347%
Synology iSCSI Storage 3.5TB
2TB free
Firmware: 4.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 93 91 94 94 87 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
23.5% Poor
Read 99.3
Write 89.3
Mixed 98.2
SusWrite 91.7
21% 94.6 MB/s
4K Read 9.5
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 9.7
32% 9.73 MB/s
DQ Read 92.1
DQ Write 84.7
DQ Mixed 85.8
65% 87.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3333 MHz
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
95.2% Outstanding
MC Read 39.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 36.5
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.8
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 31.4
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 134%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS MASTER Builds (Compare 5,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 184%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 201%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS MASTER - $479

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Very good Total price: $1,544
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback