Asus P8H67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics23.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8H67-M PRO  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130427
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 19:55
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$49
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 93
1-Core 80.9
2-Core 146
67% 107 Pts
4-Core 231
8-Core 236
32% 234 Pts
64-Core 216
14% 216 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8423) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
23.5% Poor
Lighting 72.4
Reflection 59.6
Parallax 95.5
19% 75.8 fps
MRender 67.7
Gravity 85.2
Splatting 55.1
24% 69.3 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 26%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$38
191GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 10 11 35 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 58.5
Write 62
Mixed 48.8
SusWrite 23.9
36% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.3
68% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 70%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$52
18GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 94 95 93 94 94 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
53.7% Above average
Read 92.5
Write 92.2
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 94.2
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
186% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 53.7%
Great: 86%
Asmedia ASM1153E 1TB
745GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 167 172 174 174 169 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 161
Write 160
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 171
189% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
141% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston 99U5471-012.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
51.1% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 16.4
MC Mixed 17
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 51.1%
Great: 54%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8H67-M PRO Builds (Compare 3,360 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus P8H67-M PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $310
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $158Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $55
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback