HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 62%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive77.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 10:48
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Memory 89.8
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 204
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 397
8-Core 774
69% 586 Pts
64-Core 984
61% 984 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
72.5% Very good
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 75.5
78% 85.6 fps
MRender 70.2
Gravity 79.8
Splatting 75.8
62% 75.3 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 72.5%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCSi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 163 164 160 141 153 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
77.9% Very good
Read 344
Write 182
Mixed 237
SusWrite 155
51% 230 MB/s
4K Read 35.6
4K Write 70.2
4K Mixed 39.7
142% 48.5 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 222
172% 237 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$87
577GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 109 107 106 111 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 107
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 109
68% 92.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
160% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST33000650NS 81Y9799 81Y3865IBM 3TB
206GB free
Firmware: BB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 90 94 93 89 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
56.3% Above average
Read 105
Write 93.2
Mixed 64.5
SusWrite 91
65% 88.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
110% Outstanding
MC Read 49
MC Write 42.7
MC Mixed 40.6
126% 44.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.6
39% 13.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 110%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,398 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback