HP Z620 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics73% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemHP Z620 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 158A
Memory29.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 04 '20 at 13:14
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2667 v2
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 92.2
2-Core 214
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 408
8-Core 791
71% 599 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$143
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
73% Very good
Lighting 96.9
Reflection 85.4
Parallax 75.3
79% 85.9 fps
MRender 70.3
Gravity 80.2
Splatting 74.4
62% 75 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 520 Series 180GB-$132
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LCSi
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 147 170 170 158 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Read 325
Write 185
Mixed 236
SusWrite 159
50% 226 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 64.3
4K Mixed 35.5
126% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 200
DQ Mixed 220
172% 238 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 88%
Seagate SkyHawk 4TB (2016)-$87
864GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 130 129 130 128 129 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.9% Very good
Read 129
Write 120
Mixed 68.7
SusWrite 129
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 107%
Seagate ST33000650NS 81Y9799 81Y3865IBM 3TB
323GB free
Firmware: BB3A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 96 97 100 98 97 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 90.5
Write 92.9
Mixed 58.7
SusWrite 97.7
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 9JSF51272PZ-1G9E2 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
113% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 42.8
MC Mixed 42.7
129% 45.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 13.4
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 113%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z620 Workstation Builds (Compare 2,399 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

System: HP Z620 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $345
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback