Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 27.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock FM2A68M-HD+  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160112
Uptime6.1 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 09:46
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 860K-$51
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
27.9% Poor
Memory 41.8
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 65.2
32% 50.9 Pts
4-Core 76.6
8-Core 118
12% 97.4 Pts
64-Core 140
9% 140 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 54%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1F82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 53.8
Reflection 49.1
Parallax 43
44% 48.6 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 48.2
Splatting 46.6
37% 45.4 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
125GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 65 65 73 75 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 62
Write 62.8
Mixed 45.5
SusWrite 68.5
44% 59.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
136% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 58%
Inateck ASM1153E 2TB
659GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 31 32 32 33 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 33
Write 31.2
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 31.4
23% 30.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 1 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 108%
WL1000GS A6472B 1TB
266GB free, PID 2329
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 22 22 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
10.9% Very poor
Read 29.3
Write 18.8
Mixed 18.3
SusWrite 21.2
28% 21.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
44% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 14%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C9 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
24% Poor
MC Read 10.3
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 9.8
26% 9.27 GB/s
SC Read 2.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 3.8
10% 3.37 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 24%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FM2A68M-HD+ Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock FM2A68M-HD+

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback