MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive279% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 30 '20 at 00:53
Run Duration238 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$175
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 80.2
1-Core 127
2-Core 248
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 492
8-Core 805
79% 648 Pts
64-Core 1,014
63% 1,014 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Lighting 133
Reflection 135
Parallax 115
108% 127 fps
MRender 96.5
Gravity 128
Splatting 105
90% 110 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 101%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 673 674 675 669 666 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
279% Outstanding
Read 2,541
Write 2,343
Mixed 1,587
SusWrite 700
400% 1,793 MB/s
4K Read 66.3
4K Write 162
4K Mixed 89.4
301% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 989
DQ Write 855
DQ Mixed 925
693% 923 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 279%
Great: 340%
CT500MX500SSD4 500GB
466GB free
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 244 244 243 58 185 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 466
Mixed 442
SusWrite 199
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 94.6
4K Mixed 51.2
173% 61.2 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 237
DQ Mixed 280
202% 262 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 123%
Covecube Virtual Disk 2TB
7.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 222 244 244 243 58 185 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
89.7% Excellent
Read 505
Write 454
Mixed 441
SusWrite 199
90% 400 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 80.6
4K Mixed 46.8
155% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 215
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 209
154% 203 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 89.7%
Great: 115%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 152 154 141 151 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
Read 155
Write 158
Mixed 91.3
SusWrite 150
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.9
293% 3.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 113%
WD WD100EMAZ-00WJTA0 10TB
4TB free
Firmware: 83.H0A83
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 156 160 142 151 149 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
81% Excellent
Read 128
Write 137
Mixed 87.3
SusWrite 152
93% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 7.4
4K Mixed 1
311% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 81%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
88.5% Excellent
MC Read 34.2
MC Write 32.2
MC Mixed 29.4
91% 31.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 32.1
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.5%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $521
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback