TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics94.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive207% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B450-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory28.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191231
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 18:19
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
76.7% Very good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 210
73% 130 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 813
73% 616 Pts
64-Core 1143
71% 1143 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑
This bench: 76.7%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
Asus(1043 859B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.9% Outstanding
Lighting 120
Reflection 136
Parallax 124
98% 127 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 115
Splatting 102
89% 109 fps
Poor: 93% ↑
This bench: 94.9%
 Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1132 805 660 665 664 664 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 1,347
Write 1195
Mixed 1,118
SusWrite 765
248% 1,106 MB/s
4K Read 57.1
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 70.8
232% 77.2 MB/s
DQ Read 870
DQ Write 639
DQ Mixed 745
559% 751 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑
This bench: 207%
 Great: 340%
Seagate ST500LM030-1RK17D 500GB
137GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 116 116 113 112 119 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
57.4% Above average
Read 86.6
Write 99.9
Mixed 61.2
SusWrite 112
66% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 0.6
199% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 57.4%
 Great: 67%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
449GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 108 109 109 109 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 106
Write 103
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 108
66% 90.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑
This bench: 61.2%
 Great: 61%
JMicron Generic 1TB
179GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 74 74 74 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
37.5% Below average
Read 109
Write 110
Mixed 37.4
SusWrite 73.3
107% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑
This bench: 37.5%
 Great: 145%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMK8GX4M1D3000C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.1% Very good
MC Read 27.7
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 26
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 76.1%
 Great: 103%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical TUF B450-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450-PRO GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD  $86Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples486x
Ryzen 5 3600XAMD  $199Bench 84%, 294,959 samples161x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD  $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples155x
GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia  $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples92x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples89x
RX 580AMD  $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples88x
SSD
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples47x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung  $69Bench 276%, 367,854 samples42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung  $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples36x
RAM
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples124x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples73x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples52x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $352
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback