Asus H170M-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics51% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160215
Uptime15 Days
Run DateMay 29 '20 at 17:15
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500-$67
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 75
1-Core 93.9
2-Core 188
68% 119 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 284
30% 239 Pts
64-Core 276
17% 276 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2302) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1340 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51% Above average
Lighting 62.6
Reflection 67.2
Parallax 82.1
51% 70.6 fps
MRender 68.8
Gravity 64.6
Splatting 56.2
51% 63.2 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 305 305 309 298 298 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 355
Mixed 351
SusWrite 302
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 34.4
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 37.4
139% 48.7 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 331
248% 331 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
343GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 163 168 168 169 169 168 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 158
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 167
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA362 500GB-$59
178GB free
Firmware: JP2OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 114 116 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
64.1% Good
Read 110
Write 102
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 114
70% 95.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 74%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905622-058.A00G 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
28.6% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 8.9
MC Mixed 9
27% 9.57 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 7.7
SC Mixed 9.3
22% 7.87 GB/s
Latency 90.3
44% 90.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 41%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,295 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-PLUS - $296

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $701
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback