Asus M5A97 LE R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics33.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 LE R2.0  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 28 '20 at 18:49
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6330 Six-Core
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
52.1% Above average
Memory 70.9
1-Core 24.4
2-Core 70.2
37% 55.2 Pts
4-Core 182
8-Core 290
29% 236 Pts
64-Core 289
18% 289 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Gigabyte(1458 2312) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1244 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.6% Below average
Lighting 32.5
Reflection 40.7
Parallax 76.7
26% 50 fps
MRender 63.7
Gravity 59
Splatting 52.9
47% 58.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
596GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 346 379 366 384 385 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
74.9% Very good
Read 415
Write 378
Mixed 373
SusWrite 364
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 38.8
4K Mixed 30.1
98% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 153
108% 134 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 133%
Patriot Blaze 60GB-$62
12GB free
Firmware: S9FM
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 30 37 27 26 14 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
32.3% Below average
Read 302
Write 47.3
Mixed 78.5
SusWrite 26
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 16.4
4K Write 31.3
4K Mixed 8.6
52% 18.8 MB/s
DQ Read 92.7
DQ Write 59.7
DQ Mixed 11.5
26% 54.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.3%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
931GB free
Firmware: 02.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 184 187 188 188 188 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 170
Mixed 131
SusWrite 186
125% 170 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
245% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 109%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra 123GB
31GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.9 0.9 0.9 0.8 0.9 0.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
1.97% Terrible
Read 0.8
Write 0.8
Mixed 0.8
SusWrite 0.9
1% 0.83 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
36% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 1.97%
Great: 39%
WD Elements 1TB
259GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 33 33 33 33 33 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Read 32.5
Write 29
Mixed 26.8
SusWrite 33
41% 30.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G13332 PSD34G133381 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 15.7
45% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 7.8
23% 8 GB/s
Latency 99.4
40% 99.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 42%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 LE R2.0 Builds (Compare 1,463 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 LE R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $377
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback