Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 70%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus MAXIMUS VI HERO  (all builds)
Memory29 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '17 at 22:00
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 136
2-Core 254
91% 161 Pts
4-Core 469
8-Core 710
73% 590 Pts
64-Core 716
44% 716 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2202 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 376.53
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
88.8% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 120
Parallax 114
90% 115 fps
MRender 107
Gravity 104
Splatting 106
87% 106 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Asmt 2115 250GB
178GB free
Firmware: 0
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
70.1% Very good
Read 373
Write 367
Mixed 364
82% 368 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 26.1
83% 27.9 MB/s
DQ Read 144
DQ Write 159
DQ Mixed 65.1
73% 122 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.1%
Great: 72%
Hgst HDN724040ALE640 3TB
262GB free
Firmware: CC24 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
20.1% Poor
Read 212
Write 179
Mixed 154
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 0.82
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.28
2% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 20.1%
Great: 20%
Intel 750 Series NVMe PCIe 400GB-$550
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0171 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,391
Write 930
Mixed 1,149
257% 1,157 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 174
4K Mixed 48.2
215% 87.5 MB/s
DQ Read 400
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 29.5
120% 266 MB/s
Poor: 123%
This bench: 194%
Great: 230%
ST3000DM001-1CH166 500GB
15GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 515
Write 500
Mixed 506
113% 507 MB/s
4K Read 47
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 33.6
179% 67.5 MB/s
DQ Read 47.9
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 33.3
74% 142 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 113%
Great: 133%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
519GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
59.1% Above average
Read 98.8
Write 107
Mixed 153
92% 120 MB/s
4K Read 0.43
4K Write 1.61
4K Mixed 0.17
67% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 92%
HGST Deskstar NAS 4TB-$60
73GB free
Firmware: MJAOA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 91.3
Write 97
Mixed 97.6
72% 95.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.97
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.23
101% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 92%
Hitachi HDN724030ALE640 3TB
8GB free
Firmware: MJ8OA5E0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 72.8
Write 78.5
Mixed 69.8
55% 73.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.74
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.2
84% 0.88 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMZ8GX3M1A1600C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1866C9 0215 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C10 32GB
1600, 1600, 1867, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.4% Good
MC Read 22.5
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.6
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 23.7
SC Mixed 22.1
60% 21 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MAXIMUS VI HERO Builds (Compare 2,389 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VI HERO - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $649
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback