Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.69% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	54.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (74%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-7110 APU (2015 M.Ca) 5,170 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Socket FT1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	22.2% Poor	Memory 29.9 1-Core 26.5 2-Core 52 22% 36.1 Pts	4-Core 80.2 8-Core 106 12% 92.8 Pts	64-Core 105 6% 105 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 22.2% Great: 35%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 4,472 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 82F6) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.20 Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	1.69% Terrible	Lighting 1.9 Reflection 3.85 Parallax 2.72 2% 2.82 fps	MRender 2.33 Gravity 1.93 Splatting 2.78 2% 2.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.69% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Edge E3 SSD 960GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 554GB free (System drive) Firmware: N1007C SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 301 330 325 332 320 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 364 Write 301 Mixed 276 SusWrite 307 70% 312 MB/s	4K Read 7.1 4K Write 21.5 4K Mixed 20.2 48% 16.3 MB/s	DQ Read 149 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 116 90% 125 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 105%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-CH9 M471B5173DB0-YK0 8GB 176 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.4 MC Write 3.8 MC Mixed 5.4 15% 5.2 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.9 10% 3.63 GB/s	Latency 255 16% 255 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 49%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 3%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	2,497x
HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 387,149 samples	1,740x
HD 5500 (Mobile 0.95 GHz)IntelBench 4%, 231,498 samples	1,182x

RAM
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	400x
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 1x8GBSamsungBench 37%, 122,420 samples	378x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 1x8GBHynixBench 37%, 144,145 samples	343x

Value: 22% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $64	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16