Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 170%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 105%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 171%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics167% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive288% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS ULTRA
MotherboardGigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra  (all builds)
Memory57.2 GB free of 64 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181011
Uptime4 Days
Run DateMay 25 '20 at 09:26
Run Duration281 Seconds
Run User JOR-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 95.7
1-Core 147
2-Core 296
99% 180 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 1,001
96% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,659
103% 1,659 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 102%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
167% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 238
Parallax 236
192% 237 fps
MRender 270
Gravity 232
Splatting 144
169% 216 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 167%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
171GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1311 1104 1139 1111 1071 1032 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
288% Outstanding
Read 1872
Write 1,884
Mixed 1,234
SusWrite 1128
343% 1,530 MB/s
4K Read 59.1
4K Write 142
4K Mixed 82
270% 94.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,454
DQ Write 1,268
DQ Mixed 1,345
1,013% 1,356 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 288%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
34GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 134 133 134 135 135 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
74.6% Very good
Read 128
Write 71.2
Mixed 78.1
SusWrite 132
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.7
135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.6%
Great: 113%
Kingston DT HyperX 3.0 127GB
118GB free, PID 162b, Kingston
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 264 264 263 265 179 265 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 239
Write 101
Mixed 137
SusWrite 250
236% 182 MB/s
4K Read 4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
52% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 94%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
611GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 74 76 74 74 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
51.9% Above average
Read 73.5
Write 64.9
Mixed 62.2
SusWrite 74
93% 68.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 8.1
4K Mixed 0.8
306% 3.3 MB/s
DQ Read 0.4
DQ Write 9
DQ Mixed 0.5
325% 3.3 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 59%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
376GB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 62 61 59 60 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
41.9% Average
Read 82.9
Write 82.5
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 60.4
96% 72.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 5.4
4K Mixed 0.8
213% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 59%
KINGSTON SHSS37A960G 960GB
292GB free, PID 6388
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 344
Mixed 302
356% 323 MB/s
4K Read 13.4
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 15.9
1,318% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 14
DQ Write 22
DQ Mixed 16.3
1,355% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 198%
JMicron Generic 960GB
360GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 374 372 371 371 375 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
214% Outstanding
Read 326
Write 373
Mixed 187
SusWrite 376
430% 316 MB/s
4K Read 22.2
4K Write 25.9
4K Mixed 19.8
1,637% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 23
DQ Write 32.9
DQ Mixed 21.7
1,942% 25.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 214%
Great: 221%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GZNH23F-18---------- 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
96.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 36.9
MC Mixed 29
96% 33.6 GB/s
SC Read 21.3
SC Write 41
SC Mixed 31.9
90% 31.4 GB/s
Latency 55.1
73% 55.1 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 96.2%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS ULTRA-CF Builds (Compare 7,790 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 152%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 150%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GIGABYTE Z390 AORUS Ultra - $172

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $1,223
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback