HP EliteBook 8470p

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.63% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8470p  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 179B
Memory4.1 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160427
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '17 at 23:45
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.05 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
44.5% Average
Memory 67.9
1-Core 32.9
2-Core 60.3
37% 53.7 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 203
19% 159 Pts
64-Core 203
12% 203 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 44.5%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
HP(103C 179B) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
3.63% Terrible
Lighting 4.07
Reflection 5.35
Parallax 2.78
3% 4.06 fps
MRender 4.57
Gravity 2.23
Splatting 7.7
4% 4.83 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.63%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba MQ01ABD050 500GB-$23
256GB free
Firmware: AX001A Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
43.9% Average
Read 77.1
Write 75.8
Mixed 76.7
58% 76.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.36
4K Write 1.42
4K Mixed 0.17
60% 0.65 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 62%
WD Black 2.5" 250GB (2010)-$55
195GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 89.4
Mixed 83.7
68% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.47
4K Write 1.39
4K Mixed 0.33
82% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 54%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5673EH1-CH9 Kingston 99U5428-046.A00LF 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
36.7% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.6
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.7
22% 7.8 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8470p Builds (Compare 1,414 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8470p

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $227
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback