Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 45% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	56.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16 (all builds)
Memory	56.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180411
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 22 '20 at 23:31
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	ISL-User
Background CPU	100%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 0 4,306 User benchmarks, average bench 65% CPUSocket, 2 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Memory 64.3 1-Core 86.8 2-Core 174 61% 108 Pts	4-Core 338 8-Core 621 57% 480 Pts	64-Core 1,571 97% 1,571 Pts
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% PowerColor(148C 2378) CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.4.2 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	56.1% Above average	Lighting 70.4 Reflection 68.9 Parallax 97.4 57% 78.9 fps	MRender 70.1 Gravity 72 Splatting 57.2 54% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 56.1% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 165GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1168 428 305 310 308 306 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	170% Outstanding	Read 1,407 Write 1,205 Mixed 1,024 SusWrite 471 229% 1,027 MB/s	4K Read 49.5 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 60.3 201% 67.4 MB/s	DQ Read 596 DQ Write 409 DQ Mixed 538 392% 514 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 170% Great: 280%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 6GB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 495 Write 484 Mixed 398 102% 459 MB/s	4K Read 39.1 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 50.3 166% 56.6 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 352 267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
Toshiba MD04ACA400 4TB-$140 10,635 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 3.5TB free Firmware: FP2A SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 188 180 188 179 188 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 183 Write 185 Mixed 70.4 SusWrite 183 113% 155 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.2 413% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 104%
WD Blue 320GB (2010)-$40 13,720 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 57GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 80 80 79 80 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	44.8% Average	Read 76.1 Write 80 Mixed 57.4 SusWrite 79.8 54% 73.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.9 159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 44.8% Great: 65%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 193GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 153 153 154 153 153 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	88.5% Excellent	Read 155 Write 158 Mixed 101 SusWrite 153 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 1.3 248% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 88.5% Great: 109%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$64 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 365GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 65 66 65 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Read 68.7 Write 61.1 Mixed 49.4 SusWrite 65 45% 61 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 124% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 57%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB 6,329 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 29GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.2 4.5 4.1 4 4 3.6 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 27.6 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.2 SusWrite 4.2 9% 9.88 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.2 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 1600 C11 8x8GB 23 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 8 of 16 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	MC Read 31.3 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 17.5 64% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.7 SC Write 5.9 SC Mixed 5.6 17% 6.07 GB/s	Latency 116 35% 116 ns
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 69%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EP2C602-4L/D16 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 51%

Yacht

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 65%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asrock EP2C602-4L/D16

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2697 v21stBench 64%, 772 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2670 01stBench 65%, 4,306 samples	14x
CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2650 v21stBench 64%, 1,386 samples	6x

GPU
Quadro P4000NvidiaBench 67%, 12,628 samples	5x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	4x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	4x

SSD
970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $170Bench 322%, 93,447 samples	5x
WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GBWDCBench 93%, 97,462 samples	4x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $92Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	3x

RAM
M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70DB0- M393B2G70BH0- M393B2G70BH0- 128GBSamsungBench 96%, 8 samples	3x
F3 DDR3 1600 C11 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 54%, 23 samples	3x
M393B2G70QH0- 8x16GBSamsungBench 96%, 50 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 48% - Average

Total price: $170

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16