TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Onda ONDA B320-IPC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (96th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 4 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics14.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive92.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemOnda ONDA B320-IPC  (all builds)
MotherboardOnda ONDA B320-IPC
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190911
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 21 '20 at 18:18
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
80.3% Excellent
Memory 80.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 463
8-Core 455
62% 459 Pts
64-Core 453
28% 453 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 80.3%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Vega 8 Graphics
AMD(1002 15D8) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
14.2% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 21.8
14% 18.8 fps
MRender 15.8
Gravity 16.9
Splatting 21.3
15% 18 fps
Poor: 6% ↑
This bench: 14.2%
 Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU800NS38 128GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q1204A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 105 104 105 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
92.6% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 287
Mixed 338
SusWrite 116
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 95.4
4K Mixed 51.5
175% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 242
DQ Mixed 109
122% 206 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑
This bench: 92.6%
 Great: 102%
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB
334GB free
Firmware: Q0410A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 789 644 571 575 573 574 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 49% Great: 123%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2666 C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
MC Read 35
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 35.6
103% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 23.2
SC Write 41.3
SC Mixed 27.6
88% 30.7 GB/s
Latency 79.3
50% 79.3 ns
Poor: 61% ↑
This bench: 99.3%
 Great: 90%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback