PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 0.66% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD. |
Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
System | HP Pavilion dv3 Notebook PC (all builds) |
Motherboard | Compal 306D |
Memory | 2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20101129 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '17 at 18:38 |
Run Duration | 162 Seconds |
Run User | GRC-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Duo T6600
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
|
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GeForce G105M
HP(103C 306D) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
|
0.66%
Terrible
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
22.3%
Poor
|
||||
WDC WD50 00BEVT-22ZAT0 500GB
253GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
13.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
14.5%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5 M 460Intel $130Bench 40%, 18,336 samples | 8x |
Core i5 M 480IntelBench 41%, 16,023 samples | 7x |
Core2 Duo T6500IntelBench 34%, 3,335 samples | 7x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 99,513 samples | 24x |
GeForce G105MNvidiaBench 1%, 2,411 samples | 8x |
Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset FamilyIntelBench 0%, 23,924 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $156 |