HP h9-1170

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 10% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	13.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	HP h9-1170 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 2AC8
Memory	11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120413
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Feb 14 '17 at 07:30
Run Duration	456 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8150-$770 22,181 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	62.5% Good	Memory 78.8 1-Core 65.8 2-Core 136 57% 93.4 Pts	4-Core 251 8-Core 378 39% 314 Pts	64-Core 383 24% 383 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.5% Great: 66%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7770 38,053 User benchmarks, average bench 12% HP(103C 6886) 2GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1125 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 17.1.2 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	13.4% Very poor	Lighting 16.5 Reflection 16.6 Parallax 22.2 13% 18.4 fps	MRender 14 Gravity 15.3 Splatting 18.7 13% 16 fps
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.4% Great: 14%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST6000DM 001-1XY17Z 6TB 66 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 5.5TB free Firmware: CC84 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Read 132 Write 112 Mixed 99.3 86% 115 MB/s	4K Read 1.02 4K Write 2.55 4K Mixed 0.42 136% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 112%
Seagate ST4000DX001-1CE1 4TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 3TB free Firmware: CC44 Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	79.7% Very good	Read 130 Write 146 Mixed 99.6 94% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.57 4K Mixed 0.63 202% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 79.7% Great: 91%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2TB free Firmware: CC25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 137 Write 115 Mixed 85.9 84% 113 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.19 70% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 96%
Seagate ST2000DX001-1CM1 2TB 34 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: CC43 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	76.2% Very good	Read 98.4 Write 166 Mixed 96.6 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 5.6 4K Mixed 0.54 184% 2.21 MB/s
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 76.2% Great: 97%
Seagate ST6000DX000-1H21 6TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 1TB free Firmware: CC46 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	78.4% Very good	Read 124 Write 149 Mixed 143 105% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1.22 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.2 107% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$60 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 485GB free Firmware: CC45 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	59.2% Above average	Read 102 Write 104 Mixed 111 80% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.41 4K Mixed 0.16 59% 0.64 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 59.2% Great: 96%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$93 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 477GB free Firmware: 080. Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	48.9% Average	Read 92.6 Write 77.7 Mixed 35.2 50% 68.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.47 4K Write 1.36 4K Mixed 0.17 63% 0.66 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.9% Great: 83%
ST8000DM 002-1YW112 8TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 4.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	81.2% Excellent	Read 205 Write 158 Mixed 159 215% 174 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 4.41 4K Mixed 0.44 217% 6.31 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 81.2% Great: 91%
WDC WD30EZRX-00MMMB0 2TB 2TB free, PID 1e40 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.6% Very poor	Read 26.6 Write 24.1 Mixed 19.5 29% 23.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.76 4K Write 1.08 4K Mixed 0.21 47% 0.69 MB/s

WDC WD20 EADS-65R6B1 2TB 1.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	37.2% Below average	Read 77.8 Write 94.8 Mixed 59.7 100% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.33 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.11 63% 0.71 MB/s

WDC WD10 EAVS-00M4B0 1TB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 401GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	16.4% Very poor	Read 27.8 Write 43 Mixed 38.1 50% 36.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.54 4K Write 0.92 4K Mixed 0.33 44% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 16.4% Great: 39%
ST320005 42AS 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 382GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	27.4% Poor	Read 83.2 Write 53.6 Mixed 29.4 63% 55.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.38 4K Write 1.14 4K Mixed 0.31 51% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 27.4% Great: 41%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 16JTF51264AZ-1G4D1 Elpida EBJ41UF8BCF0-DJ-F 16GB 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	43.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 15.1 45% 15.6 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 13.1 29% 10 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h9-1170 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

System: HP h9-1170

CPU
FX-8150AMD $770Bench 59%, 22,181 samples	2x

GPU
HD 7770AMDBench 12%, 38,053 samples	2x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	1x
M378B5273DH0-CK0 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 M378B5273DH0-CK0 10GBSamsungBench 42%, 2 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $770

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

HP h9-1170

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

System: HP h9-1170

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)