HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics14.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive147% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory11.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191126
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 13:15
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 155
2-Core 306
96% 180 Pts
4-Core 593
8-Core 1,079
100% 836 Pts
64-Core 1,436
89% 1,436 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
HP(103C 841E) 2GB
CLim: 1183 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.10.26.06
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
14.4% Very poor
Lighting 16.8
Reflection 28.9
Parallax 20.6
14% 22.1 fps
MRender 17.6
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 22.7
16% 18.7 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 14.4%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC511 HFM256GDJTNI-82A0A 256GB
182GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 846 891 310 307 307 308 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
147% Outstanding
Read 1,023
Write 907
Mixed 900
SusWrite 495
186% 831 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 59.2
4K Mixed 54.8
188% 57.1 MB/s
DQ Read 702
DQ Write 107
DQ Mixed 206
202% 339 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 147%
Great: 183%
Crucial MX100 256GB-$116
169GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 293 303 298 302 305 302 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Read 438
Write 329
Mixed 283
SusWrite 300
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 48.6
4K Mixed 35.5
114% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 186
DQ Write 90.3
DQ Mixed 142
104% 140 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 77.7%
Great: 97%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-3G2J1 CT8G4DFS8266.C8FN 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
74.8% Very good
MC Read 29.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 29.3
76% 26.5 GB/s
SC Read 22.7
SC Write 20.2
SC Mixed 29.4
69% 24.1 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx Builds (Compare 623 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback