Emachines EL1320

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines EL1320  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines EMCP61M
Memory0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.4 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20091103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 20 '20 at 01:37
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon LE-1660
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 1 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Memory 46.2
1-Core 28.1
2-Core 23.4
24% 32.6 Pts
4-Core 31.5
8-Core 36.3
4% 33.9 Pts
64-Core 37.7
2% 37.7 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 49%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$65
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 27 26 27 25 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 10.7
Write 7
Mixed 10.7
SusWrite 23.9
10% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GU342G0ALEPR692C6F 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 400 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
12.7% Very poor
MC Read 4.2
MC Write 4.8
MC Mixed 4.2
13% 4.4 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 1.9
SC Mixed 1.6
7% 2.33 GB/s
Latency 175
23% 175 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 12.7%
Great: 18%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback