Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 116% UFO	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	19.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190715
Uptime	1.1 Days
Run Date	May 19 '20 at 19:45
Run Duration	227 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	3%

Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193 746,287 User benchmarks, average bench 88% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Memory 92.7 1-Core 137 2-Core 276 93% 169 Pts	4-Core 542 8-Core 876 87% 709 Pts	64-Core 1,134 70% 1,134 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 100%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210 663,603 User benchmarks, average bench 115% Nvidia(10DE 13AA) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	120% Outstanding	Lighting 160 Reflection 150 Parallax 151 130% 153 fps	MRender 186 Gravity 134 Splatting 111 114% 143 fps
Poor: 105% ↑ This bench: 120% Great: 123%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 21GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,125 Write 383 Mixed 494 145% 667 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 57.4 200% 70.7 MB/s	DQ Read 720 DQ Write 390 DQ Mixed 506 389% 538 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 850 Evo 4TB-$470 765 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 1.5TB free Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 465 474 471 476 479 477 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	113% Outstanding	Read 399 Write 330 Mixed 361 SusWrite 474 88% 391 MB/s	4K Read 40.1 4K Write 75.7 4K Mixed 51.1 166% 55.6 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 321 DQ Mixed 308 242% 336 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 113% Great: 133%
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 213GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 464 473 471 475 478 477 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 406 Write 300 Mixed 307 SusWrite 473 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 32.1 4K Write 81.1 4K Mixed 42.4 146% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 381 DQ Write 307 DQ Mixed 190 184% 293 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 118%
Sandisk CFast SDDR-299 64GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 23GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 190 186 195 191 197 203 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	40.6% Average	Read 363 Write 201 Mixed 145 SusWrite 194 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 14.7 4K Write 14.8 4K Mixed 10.7 44% 13.4 MB/s	DQ Read 31.6 DQ Write 13.6 DQ Mixed 16 14% 20.4 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 40.6% Great: 53%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60 112,929 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 681GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 96 98 99 99 99 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	54% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 32.3 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 97.9 52% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 83%
Lexar CFUDMASD 32GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 17GB free, PID b035 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.9 2 2 2 1.9 MB/s Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 37.2 Write 13.7 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 1.9 22% 18.9 MB/s	4K Read 8.1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 2.8 176% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 15%
Lexar CFUDMASD 32GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 14GB free, PID b035 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 16 16 16 16 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	8.49% Terrible	Read 16.7 Write 5.8 Mixed 10.2 SusWrite 15.6 15% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.5 4K Write 0.6 4K Mixed 1.3 78% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 8.49% Great: 15%
USB 3.0 Drobo S - Gen 2 17.5TB 107 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 12.5TB free, PID 000a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 53 50 53 54 56 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	26.7% Poor	Read 85.2 Write 25.2 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 53.2 63% 51.8 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.8 59% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 26.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 8,912 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	74.8% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 28 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.5 SC Mixed 24.1 68% 23.8 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,328 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 93%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 91%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 85%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

CPU
Core i7-8700KIntel $193Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	1,520x
Core i5-8600KIntel $173Bench 91%, 264,837 samples	837x
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	575x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	404x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	346x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	343x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	116x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	105x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	97x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	146x
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	91x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	85x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $651

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16