Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z170XP-SLI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170306
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 07:53
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 94.3
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
98% 177 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 565
76% 566 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 85%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Digitazz 120GB SSD 120GB
23GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.07E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 168 162 161 158 167 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 501
Write 168
Mixed 204
SusWrite 163
57% 259 MB/s
4K Read 40.2
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 42.9
154% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 318
DQ Write 176
DQ Mixed 114
121% 203 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 99%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$60
744GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 136 137 137 137 135 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
84.4% Excellent
Read 158
Write 153
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 136
88% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
142% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.4%
Great: 108%
WD WD20PURZ-85GU6Y0 1TB
38GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 116 113 116 116 115 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 106
Write 21.5
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 115
57% 76.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.3
226% 1.57 MB/s
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$70
315GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 101 100 103 103 101 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 116
Write 110
Mixed 76.3
SusWrite 101
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 104%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
602GB free, PID a007
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 56 55 55 54 54 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 103
Write 88.5
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 54.9
88% 70.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 029E CMK16GX4M4A2800C16 029E CMK8GX4M2B3000C15 12GB
3466, 3466, 3466 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.1% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 21.1
MC Mixed 17.5
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.8
SC Write 21.9
SC Mixed 18.4
54% 19 GB/s
Latency 59.1
68% 59.1 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 59.1%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z170XP-SLI-CF Builds (Compare 1,793 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z170XP-SLI - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $665
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback