Lenovo 10ST001QUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics6.57% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10ST001QUS  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 312A
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200403
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 19 '20 at 00:55
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Memory 88
1-Core 138
2-Core 271
91% 166 Pts
4-Core 550
8-Core 885
88% 717 Pts
64-Core 1024
63% 1024 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Legend(17AA 312A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.57% Terrible
Lighting 6.47
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 8.53
5% 8.82 fps
MRender 8.43
Gravity 7
Splatting 15.9
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.57%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
878GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC64
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 132 168 176 181 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 164
Mixed 81.5
SusWrite 161
107% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 97%
Great: 112%
Generic Flash Disk 134GB
121GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 9 8.9 9 8.9 8.9 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
7.1% Terrible
Read 9.8
Write 7.5
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 8.9
12% 8.67 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.2
84% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.1%
Great: 11%
WDC WDS5 00G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
462GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 36.5
Write 36.5
Mixed 35.5
SusWrite 42.2
52% 37.7 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 14.9
1,196% 15.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.3
DQ Write 18.9
DQ Mixed 15.4
1,216% 15.9 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 93%
USB 3.0 LucidPort USB300 1TB
930GB free, PID 5000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 42 42 43 43 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
76.7% Very good
Read 39
Write 36
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 42.5
53% 38.5 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 16.9
1,275% 17.1 MB/s
DQ Read 15.8
DQ Write 19
DQ Mixed 17.3
1,293% 17.4 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 76.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 16.2
MC Write 14.1
MC Mixed 10.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 14
SC Mixed 13.1
38% 13.4 GB/s
Latency 69.5
58% 69.5 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10ST001QUS Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10ST001QUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $286
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback