Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.8% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3470-$59 223,595 User benchmarks, average bench 63% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Memory 84.6 1-Core 92.5 2-Core 187 70% 121 Pts	4-Core 327 8-Core 370 46% 348 Pts	64-Core 367 23% 367 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 430 22,369 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Device(0000 0000) 1GB CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	1.8% Terrible	Lighting 2.1 Reflection 2.46 Parallax 1.62 2% 2.06 fps	MRender 2.86 Gravity 2.03 Splatting 2.35 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.8% Great: 4%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721050CLA360 500GB 12,793 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 320GB free (System drive) Firmware: JP2OA50E SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 86 59 88 92 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	50.1% Above average	Read 96.5 Write 92.5 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 78 60% 80.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 125% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 50.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F2G64CB88G4N-CG 6GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	48.3% Average	MC Read 17.5 MC Write 17.1 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.4 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 13.8 40% 14 GB/s	Latency 72.4 55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 69%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

RAM
CT102464BA1339.M16 1x8GBCrucialBench 27%, 544 samples	5x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG 830B M2F2G64CB88G7N-CG 6GBUnknownBench 42%, 244 samples	4x
M2F8G64CB8HB5N-DI 1x8GBNanyaBench 31%, 1,467 samples	4x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $151