Asus P8Z68-V PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V PRO  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120507
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 23:51
Run Duration248 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.6% Very good
Memory 92.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 211
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 338
8-Core 510
53% 424 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 270-$140
XFX(1682 9270) 2GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Lighting 31.9
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 38.1
26% 32.9 fps
MRender 26
Gravity 27.9
Splatting 33.8
24% 29.2 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 26%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 148 127 149 154 157 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
57.2% Above average
Read 308
Write 169
Mixed 222
SusWrite 145
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 45.8
4K Mixed 27.1
90% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 138
DQ Mixed 159
123% 169 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 101%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
57GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 76 79 79 79 80 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 86.8
Write 85
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 78.3
60% 80.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
116GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 57 59 61 59 60 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
46.8% Average
Read 104
Write 101
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 58.8
65% 87.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
151% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.8%
Great: 67%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
465GB free, PID 2320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
23.8% Poor
Read 25.1
Write 24.7
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 8.6
27% 20.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 1.4
251% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 23.8%
Great: 41%
WD My Book 1140 4TB
189GB free, PID 1140
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 71 68 46 35 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
32.5% Below average
Read 97.9
Write 101
Mixed 29
SusWrite 54.9
90% 70.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 50%
WD Elements 25A2 2TB
276GB free, PID 25a2
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 8.5 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
20% Poor
Read 31.9
Write 25.7
Mixed 24.7
SusWrite 8.6
29% 22.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.4
165% 2 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20%
Great: 61%
Iomega E xternal HD 1TB
1GB free, PID 0370
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 32.3
Write 32.1
Mixed 22.8
37% 29.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
49% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 20%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
26GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.4 8.5 8.6 8.7 9 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 31.1
Write 23.7
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 8.6
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.4
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
2GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.5 8.6 8.6 8.7 8.7 8.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 14.9
Mixed 19.8
SusWrite 8.6
22% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
80GB free, PID a006
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.6 7.8 7.6 7.5 7.6 6.5 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Read 27.6
Write 25.7
Mixed 19.9
SusWrite 7.4
26% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
73% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL RipjawsX DDR3 1866 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
56.9% Above average
MC Read 20.6
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 62.9
64% 62.9 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 56.9%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V PRO Builds (Compare 1,447 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V PRO - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $989
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback