PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 73.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A98h |
Memory | 19.5 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120920 |
Uptime | 0.5 Days |
Run Date | May 16 '20 at 21:23 |
Run Duration | 191 Seconds |
Run User | FRA-User |
Background CPU | 29% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5470
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
|
35.7%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1216 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 20.4.2
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
LSI MR9260-8i 999GB
487GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 398 408 374 320 260 252 MB/s
|
73.3%
Very good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
348GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 219 218 225 226 224 MB/s
|
66.8%
Good
|
|||
LSI MR9260-8i 8TB
4.5TB free
Firmware: 2.13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 13 11 12 MB/s
|
10%
Very poor
|
|||
HGST 4TB
1TB free, PID 1013
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
|
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
18.1%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples | 17x |
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 47% - Average | Total price: $145 |