Asus X450JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X450JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450JB
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150313
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateMay 16 '20 at 13:17
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.5% Very good
Memory 87
1-Core 106
2-Core 210
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 356
8-Core 536
55% 446 Pts
64-Core 522
32% 522 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Asus(1043 1B6D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 11
11% 11.7 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 8.91
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
180GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 442 454 448 384 381 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 434
Mixed 418
SusWrite 422
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 40.5
4K Write 98.6
4K Mixed 52.8
181% 64 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 293
240% 341 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 119%
Great: 125%
WD My Passport 0810 1TB
63GB free, PID 0810
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 74 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
31.4% Below average
Read 66.6
Write 67.6
Mixed 42.3
SusWrite 73.7
85% 62.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
91% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
63.1% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 18.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 19.3
SC Mixed 22.1
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 63.1%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450JB Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback