Asus X450JB

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics10.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus X450JB  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X450JB
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150313
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 15:04
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4720HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
71.8% Very good
Memory 86.2
1-Core 98.6
2-Core 154
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 440
47% 376 Pts
64-Core 448
28% 448 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 71.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 940M
Asus(1043 1B6D) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 26.21.14.4587
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
10.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.8
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 11
11% 11.7 fps
MRender 6.29
Gravity 13.7
Splatting 8.91
8% 9.63 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 10.1%
Great: 10%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$50
181GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 391 430 430 440 392 387 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 485
Write 434
Mixed 423
SusWrite 412
99% 439 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 45.3
155% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 345
DQ Mixed 291
237% 337 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 109%
Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT102464BF186D.M16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.8% Above average
MC Read 23
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 20
50% 17.3 GB/s
Latency 71.1
56% 71.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X450JB Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus X450JB

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback