Acer Aspire XC-605

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Speed boat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 30% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	55% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	88.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Acer Aspire XC-605 (all builds)
Motherboard	Acer Aspire XC-605
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140807
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 19:21
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-4150-$41 36,627 User benchmarks, average bench 55% LGA1150, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.2% Good	Memory 96.5 1-Core 92.3 2-Core 149 70% 113 Pts	4-Core 233 8-Core 240 32% 237 Pts	64-Core 240 15% 240 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 68.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3287) CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	55% Above average	Lighting 67.4 Reflection 68 Parallax 59.7 55% 65 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 66.5 55% 67.4 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 329GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 325 316 315 317 315 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	88.4% Excellent	Read 461 Write 305 Mixed 272 SusWrite 310 75% 337 MB/s	4K Read 23.4 4K Write 91.8 4K Mixed 28.2 120% 47.8 MB/s	DQ Read 356 DQ Write 304 DQ Mixed 212 191% 291 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 88.4% Great: 129%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$25 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 204GB free Firmware: 17.01H17 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 95 92 94 94 94 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 88.7 Write 89 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 93.8 61% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 134% 1 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 69%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR16D3LU1MNG/4G 99U5474-036.A00LF 8GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 19.1 MC Mixed 16 49% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 14.3 42% 14.6 GB/s	Latency 52.4 76% 52.4 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Aspire XC-605 Builds (Compare 464 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 7%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire XC-605

CPU
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	120x
Core i3-4130Intel $41Bench 52%, 49,509 samples	73x
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	68x

GPU
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	114x
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	112x
GeForce GT 620NvidiaBench 2%, 17,163 samples	30x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	16x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $36Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	12x

RAM
HMT451U6AFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 52%, 14,558 samples	35x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	32x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 1x4GBKingstonBench 27%, 1,147 samples	25x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $166

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16