Asus H81M-C

Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 71% Battleship	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	64.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H81M-C (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 15 '20 at 14:55
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	LTU-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60 13,224 User benchmarks, average bench 72% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	79.2% Very good	Memory 91.6 1-Core 113 2-Core 216 81% 140 Pts	4-Core 361 8-Core 561 57% 461 Pts	64-Core 550 34% 550 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210 98,254 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 3629) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.17 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 0.44 1% 1.3 fps	MRender 2.43 Gravity 0.77 Splatting 1.7 1% 1.63 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89 105,079 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 191GB free (System drive) Firmware: 96R9 SusWrite @10s intervals: 342 152 94 92 83 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	64.9% Good	Read 412 Write 412 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 140 57% 256 MB/s	4K Read 24.2 4K Write 70.2 4K Mixed 14.4 92% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 310 DQ Write 281 DQ Mixed 130 143% 240 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 64.9% Great: 88%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24 496,077 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 225GB free Firmware: 1H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 117 119 118 119 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	68.1% Good	Read 120 Write 113 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 118 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 68.1% Great: 69%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 249GB 684 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 176GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 81 82 81 81 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 80 Write 46.7 Mixed 53.8 SusWrite 81.1 48% 65.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1 179% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 72%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-127.A00LF 2x2GB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	52.9% Above average	MC Read 18.8 MC Write 18.9 MC Mixed 16.1 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.7 SC Write 18.8 SC Mixed 17.1 47% 16.5 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 52.9% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H81M-C Builds (Compare 3,003 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-C - $57

CPU
Core i5-4460Intel $194Bench 62%, 245,403 samples	460x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	296x
Core i5-4590Intel $188Bench 63%, 151,366 samples	223x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	301x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	201x
HD 4400 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 64,721 samples	173x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	137x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	70x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	48x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	60x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	55x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	41x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $294

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16