Performance Results


Gaming 25% Raft	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	27.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	89.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2600-$190 185,630 User benchmarks, average bench 67% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	76.7% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 97.6 2-Core 190 74% 127 Pts	4-Core 333 8-Core 472 51% 402 Pts	64-Core 472 29% 472 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 76.7% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 7950-$290 33,820 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Sapphire(174B E210) 3GB CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.12.1 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	27.7% Poor	Lighting 34.6 Reflection 25.7 Parallax 43 28% 34.5 fps	MRender 26.2 Gravity 37 Splatting 34 27% 32.4 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 27.7% Great: 32%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 512GB-$129 14,996 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 202GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM05B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 387 374 356 317 347 383 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 472 Write 393 Mixed 329 SusWrite 361 87% 389 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 31.9 104% 34.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 319 DQ Mixed 182 182% 295 MB/s
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 118%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unifosa HU564403EP0200 HU564403EP0200 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	49.8% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.3 MC Mixed 15.3 48% 16.6 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 16.7 46% 16 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 49.8% Great: 50%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 58%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples	156x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	38x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	27x

RAM
HU524303EP0200 4x2GBUnifosaBench 49%, 508 samples	47x
HU564403EP0200 2x4GBUnifosaBench 49%, 909 samples	22x
GU512303EP0202 3x2GBUnifosaBench 39%, 442 samples	20x

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $193