Acer Veriton M265

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 27%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Veriton M265  (all builds)
MotherboardACER EG31M
Memory1.8 GB free of 3 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090924
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 23:06
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5300-$59
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
38.8% Below average
Memory 66.4
1-Core 37.1
2-Core 72.6
39% 58.7 Pts
4-Core 67.5
8-Core 71.8
9% 69.7 Pts
64-Core 72.9
4% 72.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 38.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce G210
Sapphire(174B 2180) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.16% Terrible
Lighting 1.3
Reflection 2.54
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.45 fps
MRender 2.38
Gravity 0.9
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.66 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.16%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 84 89 91 97 97 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 82
Write 81.9
Mixed 53.4
SusWrite 89.5
56% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
177% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 58%
Seagate ST3320418AS 320GB-$54
53GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 68 69 68 69 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.7% Below average
Read 66.1
Write 69.3
Mixed 45.7
SusWrite 68.3
46% 62.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 58%
WD Blue 320GB (2008)-$39
462GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 84 89 92 97 98 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 100
Write 98.1
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 90.2
65% 88.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
181% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 60%
Seagate BlackArmorDAS35 1TB
147GB free, PID 3411
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 23 23 23 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
14% Very poor
Read 28.4
Write 24
Mixed 20.9
SusWrite 23.2
32% 24.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3GB
null MHz
1024, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
14.8% Very poor
MC Read 5.3
MC Write 3.9
MC Mixed 4.1
13% 4.43 GB/s
SC Read 4.3
SC Write 4
SC Mixed 4.6
12% 4.3 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 8%
This bench: 14.8%
Great: 23%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M265 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M265

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $75
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback