HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 64% Destroyer	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	39.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	57.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	8.1 GB free of 12.001 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120418
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	May 14 '20 at 19:31
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B97 1,103 User benchmarks, average bench 55% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	57.7% Above average	Memory 83.8 1-Core 47 2-Core 92.8 49% 74.5 Pts	4-Core 186 8-Core 186 25% 186 Pts	64-Core 186 12% 186 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 57.7% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Zotac(19DA 1556) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	39.1% Below average	Lighting 50.1 Reflection 47.2 Parallax 42.4 41% 46.6 fps	MRender 41.4 Gravity 44.9 Splatting 44.3 36% 43.5 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.1% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500960G 960GB 810 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 450GB free (System drive) Firmware: 003056RI SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 165 198 193 128 108 MB/s Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	57.8% Above average	Read 230 Write 189 Mixed 194 SusWrite 152 43% 191 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 32.7 112% 38.1 MB/s	DQ Read 78 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 77.4 66% 94 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 57.8% Great: 93%
Samsung HD322HJ 320GB-$44 40,147 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 297GB free Firmware: 1AC01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 101 101 101 101 101 MB/s Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	58% Above average	Read 103 Write 102 Mixed 57.3 SusWrite 98.9 66% 90.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:00 80 RZX-D3D9M1333G/4G ID:00 80 RZX-D3D9M1333G/4G ID:01 94 SH564568FH8N0QHSC ID:01 94 SH564568FH8N0QHSC 45GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 33792 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	32.9% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 7.4 MC Mixed 11.7 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.5 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 73.8 54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $51Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $30Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16