Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 11:14
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
61.9% Good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 70.2
2-Core 119
57% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 359
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 362
22% 362 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Lighting 37.9
Reflection 29.9
Parallax 36.8
31% 34.9 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 37.7
Splatting 35.6
30% 37.3 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
497GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 456 316 232 133 409 266 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 115 115 112 116 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
65.1% Good
Read 114
Write 80.5
Mixed 97.4
SusWrite 112
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 1
189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$38
666GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 136 134 131 135 136 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 109
Write 83.4
Mixed 40.9
SusWrite 134
67% 91.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 0.4
145% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0802
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 120 128 127 131 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 131
Write 136
Mixed 45.8
SusWrite 126
145% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.4
168% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 53%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 101 102 107 107 101 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 77.1
Write 83.6
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 101
116% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
177% 2 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.7% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13.2
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 77.7
52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 755 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $95Nvidia RTX 4070 $542Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback