Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics30.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMay 14 '20 at 10:16
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 16%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8320-$129
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 79.7
1-Core 66.8
2-Core 124
56% 90.3 Pts
4-Core 217
8-Core 355
35% 286 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8613) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.4% Below average
Lighting 37.5
Reflection 29.8
Parallax 36.4
31% 34.6 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 37.4
Splatting 35.2
30% 37 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ct1000mx 50 1TB
497GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 484 289 231 69 463 269 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 56% Great: 115%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49
1TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 116 113 114 117 114 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
65.7% Good
Read 116
Write 117
Mixed 93.2
SusWrite 113
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 65.7%
Great: 84%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
666GB free
Firmware: CC24
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 142 143 130 143 143 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 116
Write 87.6
Mixed 39.7
SusWrite 140
70% 95.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.4
141% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 114%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0802
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 113 114 112 123 119 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 133
Write 128
Mixed 20.6
SusWrite 115
128% 99.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 53%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 101 102 108 107 108 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
48.4% Average
Read 78.8
Write 104
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 104
126% 90 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 4.6
4K Mixed 0.6
181% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.4%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 11.3
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $131Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback