Gigabyte Z370P D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (89th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 11 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics6.71% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive258% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370P D3
MotherboardGigabyte Z370P D3  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171109
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 23:03
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 40%

 PC Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$110
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 93.7
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
84% 148 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 466
62% 462 Pts
64-Core 449
28% 449 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i3)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
6.71% Terrible
Lighting 7.13
Reflection 11.1
Parallax 7.56
6% 8.59 fps
MRender 7.48
Gravity 6.37
Splatting 15.1
8% 9.64 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.71%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$105
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 647 329 327 329 328 328 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
258% Outstanding
Read 2,331
Write 1,477
Mixed 1,173
SusWrite 381
296% 1,341 MB/s
4K Read 64.8
4K Write 167
4K Mixed 85.9
296% 106 MB/s
DQ Read 982
DQ Write 1,237
DQ Mixed 1,010
790% 1,076 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 258%
Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 197 194 209 202 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 150
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 199
110% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0
86% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 109%
Great: 106%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 182 178 184 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 170
Write 144
Mixed 80.7
SusWrite 179
105% 144 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 100%
Great: 114%
USB Flash Memory 1GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.5 7.5 7.5 7.4 7.5 7.5 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
6.41% Terrible
Read 20.4
Write 6.7
Mixed 7
SusWrite 7.4
12% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 7.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.1
32% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.41%
Great: 6%
ST2000DM 008-2FR102 2TB
697GB free, PID 0c31
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 37 37 38 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 33.8
Write 32.3
Mixed 30.1
SusWrite 36.9
46% 33.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
46% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 16%
WDC WD10 01FALS-403AA0 1TB
169GB free, PID 2338
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 38 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 38.1
Write 36.1
Mixed 28.7
SusWrite 38.7
48% 35.4 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
103% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 1x8GB-$25
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
43.3% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 15.6
MC Mixed 11.2
40% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.1
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 60.5
66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370P D3-CF Builds (Compare 7,388 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370P D3 - $190

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback