Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics54.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160118
Uptime14 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 17:36
Run Duration201 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$113
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Memory 89
1-Core 120
2-Core 221
82% 144 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 454
61% 457 Pts
64-Core 454
28% 454 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 445.75
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
54.5% Above average
Lighting 64.4
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 49.5
52% 58.6 fps
MRender 71.3
Gravity 68.9
Splatting 72.7
58% 71 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
210GB free
Firmware: S1022A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 275 127 120 109 111 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 462
Write 377
Mixed 369
SusWrite 142
75% 338 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 96.5
4K Mixed 25.9
124% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 228
DQ Write 299
DQ Mixed 40.5
93% 189 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 102%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 101 124 120 125 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Read 70.5
Write 134
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 117
64% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$90
888GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 159 159 159 160 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Read 150
Write 158
Mixed 29
SusWrite 158
89% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 108%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$72
384GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 54 52 54 53 54 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
36% Below average
Read 71.7
Write 84
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 53.4
48% 65.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 57%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 5TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0406
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 115 117 125 118 118 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 72
Write 80.7
Mixed 85
SusWrite 117
66% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 7.2
4K Mixed 0.7
228% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST33000651AS 3TB-$78
982GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 110 111 112 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
63.5% Good
Read 110
Write 110
Mixed 62
SusWrite 110
72% 98.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
WD My Book Essentials 1.5TB
28GB free, PID 1110
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 36 38 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 34.5
Write 33.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 36.4
44% 32.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
50% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 21%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64AZ-2G1A2 Kingston KHX2133C14D4/8G 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
42.6% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.9
MC Mixed 13.2
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 13.4
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback