TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.6% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive49% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemFujitsu CELSIUS W280  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D2912-A1
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110406
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 14:15
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
CPU, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Memory 93.6
1-Core 87.7
2-Core 174
71% 118 Pts
4-Core 310
8-Core 404
46% 357 Pts
64-Core 407
25% 407 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 74.8%
 Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI FirePro V3800 (FireGL V)
AMD(1002 210A) 512MB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.0
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
3.6% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 3.69
Parallax 4.75
4% 4.38 fps
MRender 3.29
Gravity 4.33
Splatting 3.87
3% 3.83 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.6%
 Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba Q300 240GB-$85
165GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM12.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 174 131 106 160 144 MB/s
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
49% Average
Read 237
Write 231
Mixed 217
SusWrite 149
47% 209 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 17.5
71% 27.1 MB/s
DQ Read 209
DQ Write 191
DQ Mixed 143
123% 181 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 49%
 Great: 93%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
348GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 111 110 110 107 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
63.2% Good
Read 111
Write 99.7
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 109
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑
This bench: 63.2%
 Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M378B5773CH0-CH9 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
42.2% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 13.1
MC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 13.2
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 60.7
66% 60.7 ns
Poor: 21% ↑
This bench: 42.2%
 Great: 42%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical CELSIUS W280 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu CELSIUS W280

CPU
Core i7 870Intel  $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples22x
Core i7 860Intel  $320Bench 64%, 51,451 samples9x
Core i5 650Intel  $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples1x
GPU
FirePro 3800 (FireGL) Graphics AdapterATIBench 4%, 464 samples5x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples4x
GTX 750-TiNvidia  $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples2x
SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial  $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples3x
BX500 120GBCrucial  $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples2x
870 EVO 500GBSamsung  $68Bench 104%, 60,851 samples2x
RAM
M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GBUnknownBench 37%, 202 samples3x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples2x
CM3X2G1600C9 4x2GBCorsairBench 50%, 173 samples2x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $128
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback