HP p6-2371ef

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP p6-2371ef  (all builds)
MotherboardFoxconn 2ADA
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20120829
Uptime26.1 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 09:56
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 87%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
69.3% Good
Memory 84.4
1-Core 90.3
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 311
8-Core 332
42% 322 Pts
64-Core 333
21% 333 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 74%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
574GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 114 115 111 114 110 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 114
Write 122
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 112
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 76%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$75
419GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 92 92 93 92 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 104
Write 111
Mixed 56
SusWrite 91.7
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
144% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 168 170 169 169 170 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
93.9% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 139
Mixed 75.1
SusWrite 169
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 93.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 029E CMZ4GX3M1A1600C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
50.6% Above average
MC Read 18.5
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 16.2
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15
SC Mixed 15
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 72.8
55% 72.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical p6-2371ef Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP p6-2371ef

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback