ECS H61H2-I3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive33.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (89%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H61H2-I3  (all builds)
Memory9.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130716
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMay 12 '20 at 09:53
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 89%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G2030-$24
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
47.9% Average
Memory 70
1-Core 75.4
2-Core 161
59% 102 Pts
4-Core 156
8-Core 134
20% 145 Pts
64-Core 145
9% 145 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Elitegroup(1019 7D8E) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5100
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.63
Reflection 1.65
Parallax 1.25
1% 1.51 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 1.03
Splatting 3.26
2% 2.4 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$175
341GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3FD6SD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 199 145 112 143 116 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
33.7% Below average
Read 195
Write 200
Mixed 168
SusWrite 151
40% 179 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 3.4
53% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 19.4
DQ Write 73.1
DQ Mixed 35.1
30% 42.5 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 92%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 750GB
164GB free
Firmware: 0204
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 26 26 26 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 24.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 22.3
SusWrite 26
18% 24.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2F4G64CB88B7N-DI 0080 Atermiter9.A01LF 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
31.2% Below average
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 11
MC Mixed 9.4
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 9.2
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 9.6
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 101
39% 101 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H61H2-I3 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H61H2-I3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 31% - Below average Total price: $20
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback