Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	75.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	45.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190730
Uptime	7 Days
Run Date	May 12 '20 at 03:43
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	GTM-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$96 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.4% Outstanding	Memory 93.2 1-Core 127 2-Core 251 88% 157 Pts	4-Core 493 8-Core 745 77% 619 Pts	64-Core 736 46% 736 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.4% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Asus(1043 873A) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 445.87 Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	75.3% Very good	Lighting 94.4 Reflection 86.8 Parallax 82.3 77% 87.8 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 78.6 Splatting 74.7 72% 90.5 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 75.3% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$51 156,194 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF220400 SusWrite @10s intervals: 290 120 104 43 46 49 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	45.3% Average	Read 450 Write 364 Mixed 292 SusWrite 108 68% 304 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 33.6 4K Mixed 7 59% 20.5 MB/s	DQ Read 118 DQ Write 65.7 DQ Mixed 13.5 31% 65.6 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 55%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 376GB free Firmware: HPH4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 147 149 150 148 148 MB/s Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	86.9% Excellent	Read 155 Write 153 Mixed 80.3 SusWrite 148 98% 134 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 86.9% Great: 112%
Toshiba MK3265GSX H 320GB 991 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 9GB free Firmware: GJ001Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 39 40 40 40 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	23.3% Poor	Read 41 Write 39 Mixed 17.5 SusWrite 39.8 25% 34.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.4 93% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 23.3% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C16 1x8GB 32,519 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	44.2% Average	MC Read 16.8 MC Write 15.2 MC Mixed 11.7 42% 14.6 GB/s	SC Read 13.1 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.7 39% 13.7 GB/s	Latency 61.6 65% 61.6 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME H370M-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,118 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 13%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H370M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	221x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	142x
Core i5-9400FIntel $96Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	114x

GPU
UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)IntelBench 5%, 147,588 samples	69x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	69x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	55x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	40x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	27x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	25x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	41x
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	34x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	20x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $325

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16