Emachines ET1862

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemEmachines ET1862  (all builds)
MotherboardeMachines ET1862
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100506
Uptime3.2 Days
Run DateMay 11 '20 at 13:15
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-750-$72
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 91.5
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 137
63% 101 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 236
32% 236 Pts
64-Core 242
15% 242 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 380-$200
CLim: 990 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 20.2.2
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.3% Below average
Lighting 43.3
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 49.9
35% 46.6 fps
MRender 46.8
Gravity 40.2
Splatting 34.3
32% 40.4 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34.3%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS128GSSD630 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20140113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 125 125 75 55 107 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 196
Write 77.5
Mixed 143
SusWrite 103
29% 130 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 8.2
43% 16.6 MB/s
DQ Read 69.3
DQ Write 71.3
DQ Mixed 15.7
27% 52.1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 44%
Hitachi HCS5C3232SLA380 320GB
70GB free
Firmware: ST2OA37E
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 53 54 54 53 53 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
31% Below average
Read 55
Write 47.7
Mixed 32.5
SusWrite 52.9
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 31%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 250GB (2008)-$80
1GB free
Firmware: 01.03E01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 61
Write 61.5
Mixed 46
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 9905413-008.A00LF 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 11.9
MC Mixed 10.7
33% 11.5 GB/s
SC Read 7.9
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 9.9
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 65
62% 65 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 35%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ET1862 Builds (Compare 16 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Emachines ET1862

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $110
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback